| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Correspondence |
London, UK
To the Editor:
VanDenKerkhof et al.1 present a fascinating study into the many benefits of personal digital assistants (PDAs) in the clinical setting. I was involved in setting up a PC-based database for anesthetic interventions in a UK maternity hospital. Electronic data capture proved to be much more effective than the use of paper. However, I encountered many problems with the clinical use of PDAs and I would be interested to know of the authors approach to these.
I have recently worked on a maternity unit where they attempted to use a PDA for data collection, but this was discontinued due to problems one and two outlined above.
Whilst many anesthesiologists in the UK have been keen advocates of PDAs for personal use, I suspect that the technology may not yet be advanced or robust enough for institutional use.
Reference
1 VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Lane J, Rimmer MJ, Van Dijk JP. Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 36875.
Related articles in CJA:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |