CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bui, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bui, P. K.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:519 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004


Correspondence

Maxillary jewelry in a parturient: a new cause for concern

Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski, MD and Penna K. Bui, MD

San Diego, California

To the Editor:

A new fashion of self-expression through body piercing in unconventional sites among young adults (including pregnant women) appears to continue to increase in our society. We previously described the anesthetic implications of oral (tongue piercing),1 and nasal (alar piercing),2 jewelry in parturients requiring anesthesia in the peripartum period, and made a recommendation that oral/nasal jewelry should be removed prior to the administration of anesthesia (of any kind). However, we recently administered an uneventful epidural anesthesia to a 22-yr-old parturient with a non-reassuring fetal heart tracing for forceps assisted vaginal delivery. The patient had a piece of jewelry attached to her maxillary gumline with through and through fixation (FigureGo). Removal of the maxillary jewelry would have required special tools. We elected to not try and remove the maxillary jewelry because of the urgent nature of the case. We would welcome comments from colleagues from other institutions on their guidelines for the management of labour analgesia in parturients presenting with oral/nasal jewelry in situ.



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE Gingival jewelry (anterior view).

 

References

1 Kuczkowski KM, Benumof JL. Tongue piercing and obstetric anesthesia: is there cause for concern? J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 447–8.[Medline]

2 Kuczkowski KM, Benumof JL, Moeller-Bertram T, Kotzur A. An initially unnoticed piece of nasal jewelry in a parturient: implications for intraoperative airway management. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 359–62.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bui, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuczkowski, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bui, P. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS