CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in CJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, A. Y.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, A. Y.C.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:637 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004


Correspondence

Is PDPH from a 25-gauge Whitacre needle always short-lasting and self-resolving?

Andrew Y.C. Wong, FHKAM

Hong Kong, China

To the Editor:

With the development of small gauge pencil-point needles, the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in obstetric patients has diminished considerably. Most of the studies on PDPH focus on its incidence and prevention.1 In our hospital, the majority of Cesarean deliveries are performed under spinal anesthesia for which we use only 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needles (Becton-Dickinson, Madrid, Spain). Recently, two patients developed PDPH after spinal anesthesia.

A 35-yr-old parturient received spinal anesthesia with a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle at L3–4 interspace. At the 24 hr follow-up, the patient had no complaints. At 48 hr after the spinal injection, she developed severe postural headache not relieved with propoxyphene and paracetamol and associated with neck pain. The headache improved in the evening, became mild on the next day and resolved completely on the third day.

Another 35-yr-old parturient underwent an uneventful spinal anesthesia with a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle at the L3–4 interspace. Similar to the first patient, she developed severe postural headache not relieved with propoxyphene and paracetamol 48 hr after the spinal injection. Her headache became mild four hours afterwards and disappeared completely on the following day.

There has been extensive research on the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of PDPH.2 There is, however, a paucity of information on the clinical course of PDPH secondary to the use of different needles. In the meta-analysis of obstetrical studies on PDPH by Choi’s group, PDPH had an onset of one to seven days after dural puncture and lasted from 12 hr to seven days, but PDPH was not characterized according to type of needle.3 In a study comparing five spinal needles, the use of 25-gauge Whitacre needles was associated with a 3.1% incidence of PDPH and 0% blood patch.4 Epidural blood patch for PDPH is not without risks and timing of the procedure remains controversial and non-standardized. Studies on the clinical course of PDPH including the onset, severity and duration are desirable. It would be reassuring to know if PDPH from a small gauge pencil-point spinal needle such as the Whitacre needle is mostly self-resolving within a short period of time, obviating the need for an epidural blood patch.

References

1 Choi PT, Galinski SA, Lucas S, Takeuchi L, Jadad AR. Examining the evidence in anestheisa literature: a survey and evaluation of obstetrical postdural puncture headache reports. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 49–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 718–29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3 Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 460–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4 Vallejo MC, Mandell GL, Sabo DP, Ramanathan S. Postdural puncture headache: a randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 916–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related articles in CJA:

REPLY
Peter T.-L. Choi
CJA 2004 51: 637-638. [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in CJA
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, A. Y.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, A. Y.C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS