| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Takashi Asai, Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizono-cho, Moriguchi City, Osaka, 570-8507, Japan. Phone: 0081-6-6992-1001; Fax: 0081-6-6991-1301; E-mail: asait{at}takii.kmu.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical features: A 49-yr-old man with the saber-sheath trachea (stenosis of the entire intrathoracic trachea) was scheduled for a posterior fossa surgery for resection of a cerebellar tumour. Anesthesia was induced by allowing the patient to inhale spontaneously oxygen and increasing concentrations of sevoflurane up to 5%, without airway obstruction. After injection of vecuronium, an airway exchange catheter was inserted orally into the trachea. A laryngeal mask airway was then inserted with the exchange catheter in place and, with the aid of a fibrescope, a 6.0-mm reinforced tracheal tube was passed through the laryngeal mask into the trachea so that the tip of the tube was about 1 cm proximal to the stenosis. The patient was turned to the prone position and the operation proceeded uneventfully.
Conclusions: The laryngeal mask and an airway exchange catheter were used as backups to tracheal intubation in this patient with tracheal stenosis in the prone position. Should the trachea be extubated accidentally, it may be re-intubated through the laryngeal mask and ventilation may be possible through the laryngeal mask or the exchange catheter.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The airway management of the patient with a tracheal stenosis is a challenge to anesthesiologists. Airway management can become more difficult when such a patient requires surgery in the prone position. There have been no reports of airway management of a patient with tracheal stenosis undergoing surgery in the prone position. We report successful management of the airway in such a patient.
| Case presentation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary function studies indicated obstructive airway disease with a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity of 53%; vital capacity was 87% of predicted. Analysis of arterial blood gases showed 80 PaO2 mmHg, PaCO2 44 mmHg, and pH 7.4. Despite the tracheal stenosis, the patient had no respiratory symptoms. Clear breath sounds were heard equally over both lung fields. No chest wall retraction was observed.
In the operating room, an electrocardiograph, pulse oximeter and blood pressure cuff were attached. After pre-oxygenation of the patient, anesthesia was induced by allowing the patient to inhale spontaneously oxygen and increasing concentrations of sevoflurane up to 5%, without airway obstruction. A laryngoscope was inserted to confirm that the glottis could be seen. Vecuronium 8 mg was injected intravenously, and the lungs were ventilated manually via a facemask without difficulty.
After neuromuscular blockade was established, a laryngoscope was inserted and an airway exchange catheter (Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA; internal diameter: 1.6 mm; outer diameter: 2.7 mm, length 45 cm) was inserted orally into the trachea until the 23 cm mark had just passed the gap between the right upper and lower molars; the catheter was fixed to the right cheek. A size 5 laryngeal mask airway was then inserted without difficulty (with the exchange catheter in place) and provided adequate ventilation. The correct position of the laryngeal mask was confirmed by passing a fibreoptic bronchoscope down the laryngeal mask. With the aid of the fibrescope, a reinforced tracheal tube (internal diameter: 6.0 mm; Mallinckrodt, Athlone, Ireland) was passed through the laryngeal mask into the trachea so that the tip of the tube was about 1 cm proximal to the stenosis. Therefore, only the distal 3 to 4 cm of the tube were inserted into the trachea (Figure
). The cuff of the tracheal tube was not inflated because it was positioned at the glottis. The gap between the tracheal tube and the connector of the laryngeal mask was sealed using adhesive tape. It was possible to ventilate the lungs adequately without leakage of gas around the tracheal tube. With the aid of the fibrescope [(diameter: 3 mm) which was passed through the tracheal tube], the exchange catheter was adjusted so that its tip was about 2 cm proximal to the tracheal carina (Figure
).
|
After an uneventful intraoperative course, the patient was turned to the supine position, the tracheal tube was removed, and neuromuscular blockade was antagonized with neostigmine. After the patient had regained consciousness without any signs of airway obstruction, the exchange catheter and the laryngeal mask were removed without complications. The postoperative course was uneventful.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a previous report of airway management of a patient with saber-sheath trachea, in order to dilate the stenosed trachea, the trachea was deliberately fractured using a speculum after a small-bore tracheal tube had been inserted.8 However, these procedures may worsen the stenosis.9 When tracheal intubation is required in the patient with an uncollapsible tracheal stenosis, the tip of the tube is usually positioned proximal to the stenosis, to avoid possible worsening of the stenosis. In addition, insertion of a tube beyond the stenosis further narrows the diameter of the airway. One major risk associated with placing a tracheal tube proximal to the stenosis is that the tube may be dislodged accidentally from the trachea and a clear airway may be lost. In the patient with a saber-sheath trachea, the intrathoracic part of the trachea is stenosed and thus only the distal 3 to 4 cm of the tracheal tube can be inserted beyond the glottis.
We used two backup methods to minimize the risk of loosing a clear airway: a laryngeal mask airway and an airway exchange catheter. We considered that if extuba-tion occurred during surgery, the laryngeal mask airway might allow ventilation and/or re-intubation. Accidental extubation in the prone position may usually be minimized by suturing the tracheal tube to the lips or the gum, but this method of fixation cannot prevent extubation secondary to looping of the tracheal tube in the oropharynx. The presence of the laryngeal mask may minimize (although it cannot abolish) this risk. Another problem when positioning a tracheal tube proximal to the stenosis is that the cuff may be positioned at the level of the glottis and damage the vocal cords. We could effectively prevent leakage of gas around the tracheal tube without inflating the cuff by leaving the laryngeal mask over the tracheal tube and sealing the gap between the tracheal tube and the laryngeal mask using adhesive tape. The intubating laryngeal mask might have been an option, but we considered that it was not suitable to leave the device in place for a prolonged period because the metal tube of the device would constantly exert pressure on the surrounding tissues.10
The second backup consisted of an airway exchange catheter. By inserting the catheter into the trachea until its tip was positioned near the carina, oxygenation could still have been achieved by applying jet ventilation through the catheter if both the tracheal tube and the laryngeal mask airway had become dislodged. A possible drawback of this method is that the exchange catheter can further narrow the airway and may increase inflation pressure. In this case, we judged that the exchange catheter could be left in place because the peak airway pressure was 24 cm H2O.
In conclusion, the laryngeal mask and an airway exchange catheter were used as backups to tracheal intubation in a patient with tracheal stenosis undergoing surgery in the prone position. Had the trachea been extubated accidentally, it could have been re-intubated through the laryngeal mask and ventilation would have been possible through the laryngeal mask or the exchange catheter.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Callan E, Karandy EJ, Hilsinger RL Jr. "Saber-sheath" trachea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97: 5125.[Medline]
3 Asai T, Fujise K, Uchida M. Laryngeal mask and tracheal stenosis (Letter). Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 81.
4 Asai T, Fujise K, Uchida M. Use of the laryngeal mask in a child with tracheal stenosis. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 9034.[Medline]
5 Verghese C, Smith TG, Young E. Prospective survey of the use of the laryngeal mask airway in 2359 patients. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 5860.[Medline]
6 Milligan KA. Laryngeal mask in the prone position (Letter). Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 449.
7 McCaughey W, Bhanumurthy S. Laryngeal mask placement in the prone position (Letter). Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 11045.[Medline]
8 Bayes J, Slater EM, Hedberg PS, Lawson D. Obstruction of a double-lumen endotracheal tube by a saber-sheath trachea. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 1868.
9 Asai T. Tracheal intubation in patients with "saber-sheath" trachea (Letter). Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 4278.
10 Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 12961300.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Edgcombe, K. Carter, and S. Yarrow Anaesthesia in the prone position Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 165 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cook, M. Asif, R. Sim, and J. Waldron Use of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway and a Ravussin cricothyroidotomy needle in the management of laryngeal and subglottic stenosis causing upper airway obstruction Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 554 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |