CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalens, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalens, B.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:741 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004


Correspondence

More on regional anesthesia induction rooms

Bernard Dalens, MD

Sainte-Foy, Québec

To the Editor:

I would like to comment on a recent editorial on the interest of an induction room.1 Basically, the creation of an induction room involves four issues: quality of anesthesia care; functioning costs; timing of patient management; and benefits for teaching.

Cost issues involve the salary of a medical assistant and expenses related to running an additional "operating" room. However, when the patient is successfully blocked, his/her stay in the operating room is shortened as induction is eliminated, and there are no additional anesthetic expenses. The anesthesiologist remains available for the next block procedure and after surgery, the patient can bypass the recovery room, saving money, occupational time and a bed. Thus, a functioning induction room represents a transfer of activity rather than new activity.

In institutions doing mostly local anesthesias (no required "soak" time for block installation) or when regional techniques are occasional, an induction room is of lesser interest. Conversely, when the load of conduction block patients is heavy, an induction room allows optimizing the occupation time of up to three operating rooms. Performing a plexus block requires approximately 30 min (equipment/medication set-up, procedure and clean up): up to 16 patients per-eight hour day can be treated. When adding the time for block installation (30 min, no staff assistance required), one hour of operating room time can be spared for each successfully blocked patient.

Lastly, an induction room is more suited for teaching regional anesthesia than can be a busy operating room with awaiting surgeons.

Reference

1 Drolet P, Girard M. Regional anesthesia, block room and efficiency: putting things in perspective (Editorial). Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 1–5.[Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalens, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalens, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS