| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology, and
Radiology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, C.H.U Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Emmanuel Guntz, Anesthesiology Department, C.H.U. Saint-Pierre, rue Haute, 322, Brussels, 1000 Belgium. Phone: 003225353593; Fax: 003225354070; E-mail: eguntz{at}ulb.ac.be
Address requests for reprints to: Dr. Maurice Sosnowski, Anesthesiology Department, C.H.U. Saint-Pierre, rue Haute, 322, Brussels, 1000, Belgium. Phone: 003225353593; Fax: 003225354070; E-mail: maurice_sosnowski{at}stpierre-bru.be
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: After an anatomical study on six cadavers, we performed sciatic nerve blocks on 20 patients. A 100-mm insulated needle and a nerve stimulator were used; 20 mL of lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine were injected.
Results: Patients lied in the supine position, the thigh flexed, abducted and rotated externally (30° in all directions). The leg was flexed at 130°. In this position, above the adductor tubercle, a depression known as Joberts fossa is palpated. Through this groove, a medial approach to the sciatic nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa is possible. The mean distance between the adductor tubercle and the puncture site is 6.18 cm (range 48 cm) and the mean distance between the skin and the sciatic nerve is 6.62 cm (range 49 cm). Mean time to perform the block was 100 sec (range 55165 sec). Complete motor blockade was obtained after a mean time of 30 min (range 560 min) inside the common peroneal nerve area and 43 min (range 1575 min) inside the tibial nerve area. Motor block was complete in 17 patients and sensory block in 18 patients. No vessel puncture was observed.
Conclusion: We describe a new medial approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. More studies will be required to demonstrate the technique is effective and safe.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this first prospective study we describe a medial approach at the inferior third of the thigh that also allows the patient to remain in the supine position.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Following these anatomical investigations, we designed a new approach to block the sciatic nerve. The Medical Ethics Committee approved this prospective study and written informed consent was obtained from 20 patients, ASA physical status I to III. Patients received standard monitoring and were sedated with midazolam 1 to 2 mg iv. After skin disinfection, a 22-gauge insulated 100-mm needle (Stimuplex A Braun, D-34209 Melsungen, Germany) was used. The nerve stimulator (Stimuplex HNS 11, Braun D-34209 Melsungen, Germany) variables were initially set at 1.5 mA, 2 Hz, 0.1 msec. When motor responses were obtained (plantar flexion of the foot for the tibial nerve, dorsal flexion of the foot for the common peroneal nerve), nerve stimulation was progressively decreased to 0.5 mA. After careful aspiration and a 1-mL test dose, 20 mL of local anesthetic (lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000) were injected. In addition a saphenous nerve block was always performed under the knee (5 mL of the same local anesthetic).
We measured both the adductor tubercle-puncture site and the skin-sciatic nerve distances. We recorded the time to perform the block and the motor responses (tibial or peroneal). Sensory block onset times were checked after five, ten, 20, 30, 45, 60, 75 min by a pinprick test (needle of a Dejerines reflex hammer, neurologicals 5038) and a cold test in the following territories: tibial nerve, common peroneal nerve and medial cutaneous sural nerve. Motor block onset times were checked at the same time (plantar flexion of the foot for the tibial nerve, dorsal flexion of the foot for the common peroneal nerve). Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two first authors (experienced anesthesiologists). Randomization was performed with the random permuted block method.
Patients were asked to classify the procedure in one of three categories: no discomfort, unpleasant, painful.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Clinical results
The mean age, weight and height of patients, nine men and 11 women, were 39 yr (range 2865 yr), 73 kg (range 50100 kg) and 170 cm (range 162188 cm).
Surgeries for ankle fracture (five patients), foot fracture (five patients), hallux valgus (six patients) and hardware removal (two patients) were performed in the presence (15 cases) or absence (three cases) of a tourniquet positioned under the knee, solely under regional anesthesia.
Results from our anatomical study guided the clinical procedure. The patient is placed in the position described previously with the anesthesiologist holding the sartorious and gracilis muscles between the medius and the thumb. The pulp of the thumb is advanced inside the groove between these muscles and the vastus medialis muscle (Figure 2
). A 100-mm needle is inserted perpendicular to the skin, in the middle of the groove indicated by the thumb, anterior to the sartorius muscle. The orientation of the needle remains the same during the entire procedure. The mean distance between the puncture site and the adductor tubercle is 6.18 cm (range 48 cm). The mean needle length to reach the sciatic nerve is 6.62 cm (range 49 cm). Tibial nerve response is more frequently obtained (Table
). Blocks are performed in a mean time of 100 sec (range 50165 sec). Mean time to obtain a complete motor blockade in the tibial nerve area is 43 min (range 1575 min) and 30 min (range 560 min) in the common peroneal nerve area (Table
). The medial cutaneous sural nerve was not blocked in two cases. We obtained a complete motor blockade in 17 patients and a complete sensory blockade in 18 patients out of 20 (Table
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The wide range of values to obtain complete blockade could be related to the limited (20 mL) volume injected.
The fact that the needle doesnt pass through the muscles is an interesting feature that probably explains the patients good acceptance of the procedure (Figure 3
). From a theoretical point of view this anatomical approach should allow to block the saphenous nerve through the trans-sartorial approach before the needle is totally withdrawn.11 These new landmarks could also be useful for continuous sciatic nerve block and provide analgesia after ankle and foot surgery.12 Position of the catheter could be monitored easily at this site. Finally, since the traumatized lower limb position is often in a position similar to the one described in this approach, the block might be of interest in the emergency room.
Further studies will be required to demonstrate that the sciatic nerve block through the medial approach is an efficient and safe technique.
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Rorie DK, Byer DE, Nelson DO, Sittipong R, Johnson KA. Assessment of block of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesth Analg 1980; 59:3716.
3 Gouverneur JM. Sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa with atraumatic needles and nerve stimulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1985; 4:3919.
4 Singelyn F, Gouverneur JM, Gribomont BF. Popliteal sciatic nerve block aided by a nerve stimulator: a reliable technique for foot and ankle surgery. Reg Anesth 1991; 16:27881.[Medline]
5 Guardini R, Waldron BA, Wallace WA. Sciatic nerve block: a new lateral approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985; 29:5159.[Medline]
6 McLeod DH, Wong DH, Claridge RJ, Merrick PM. Lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block compared with subcutaneous infiltration for analgesia following foot surgery. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:6736.
7 Zetlaoui PJ, Bouaziz H. Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:7982.
8 Paqueron X, Bouaziz H, Macalou D, et al. The lateral approach to the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa: one or two injections? Anesth Analg 1999; 89:12215.
9 Vloka JD, Hadzic A, Kitain E, et al. Anatomic considerations for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa through the lateral approach. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:4148.[Medline]
10 Travin AA, Kovanov BB. Surgical Anatomy of the Lower Limb. Moscou: Medicina; 1963.
11 van der Wal M, Lang SA, Yip RW. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40:5426.
12 Singelyn FJ, Aye F, Gouverneur JM. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique of postoperative analgesia after foot surgery. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:3836.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Eurin, H. Beloeil, and P. J. Zetlaoui Une approche mediale pour un bloc sciatique continu par voie poplitee.: [A medial approach for a continuous sciatic block in the popliteal fossa]. Can J Anesth, November 1, 2006; 53(11): 1165 - 1166. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |