| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anaesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Ross Barlow, Department of Anaesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G IX8, Canada. Phone: 416-813-7445; Fax: 416-813-7543; E-mail: ross.barlow{at}sickkids.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Thirty healthy chilren aged one to six years scheduled for orchidopexy or hypospadias repair under general anesthesia were enrolled. Anesthesia was maintained with a propofol infusion targeting an estimated serum level of 3 µg·mL1, remifentanil 0.2 µg·kg1·min1 and a caudal epidural block. Transcranial Doppler sonography was used to measure Vmca at five-minute intervals. In half the patients, propofol was substituted with desflurane 1 MAC, 30 min prior to the end of the surgical procedure. Once steady-state had been achieved recordings of Vmca, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were resumed. Upon termination of the surgical procedure, the maintenance agent was discontinued and recordings continued at one-minute intervals during emergence of anesthesia.
Results: There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Vmca increased from 37.2 ± 3.1 cm·sec1 to 57.7 ± 4.1 cm·sec1 when propofol was changed to desflurane (P < 0.01). Upon emergence of anesthesia, Vmca decreased from 57.8 ± 4.2 cm·sec1 to 37.8 ± 3.2 cm·sec1 in the desflurane group (P < 0.01) but remained unchanged in the propofol group.
Conclusion: Desflurane is associated with an increase in cerebral blood flow velocity when used to facilitate rapid emergence following a propofol infusion in children. This may be of clinical significance in patients with intracranial pathology.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each child received a caudal epidural block with 1.0 mL·kg1 of 0.25% bupivicaine without epinephrine in order to eliminate the cerebrovascular response to surgical stimulation. Surgery was allowed to commence 20 min after the caudal block was performed and the analgesic effect was assumed to be successful if, upon skin incision, the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) did not vary more than 5% from baseline. Fluid deficits secondary to fasting and ongoing losses were replaced with an initial bolus of lactated Ringers solution 8 mL·kg1 followed by a maintenance infusion of 10 mL·kg1·hr1. Further fluids were given as necessary to maintain normotension. A convective air warmer (Bair Hugger 500/OR, USA) and conductive heating mattress (Gaymar, New York, NY, USA) were used to maintain normothermia.
A transcranial Doppler probe (TCD; Neuroguard, Medasonics, Fremont, CA, USA) was placed to measure Vmca at the M1 segment using a 2-MHz emitted ultrasonic frequency. Simultaneous recordings of Vmca, HR, and MAP were taken at five-minute intervals throughout the study period. Patients were randomized using a computer generated random number table. In half the patients, propofol was substituted with desflurane, age-adjusted to 1 MAC, 30 min before the end of the surgical procedure (desflurane-substituted group). In the other half, the propofol infusion was continued (propofol group). Fifteen minutes were allowed to achieve steady-state and recordings of Vmca, HR, and MAP were resumed at five-minute intervals. Upon termination of the surgical procedure, the maintenance agent was discontinued and recordings continued at one-minute intervals for five minutes, during anesthetic emergence in both groups under remifentanil alone.
Statistical analysis
Demographics and data with parametric values are presented as mean ± SD. The number of patients needed to demonstrate a direct effect on Vmca during changes in anesthetic agent was calculated with the assumption that a 20% change would be clinically relevant. Based on a statistical power of 0.8, an
2 = 0.05 and a ß = 0.2, seven patients per group was suggested. The Students unpaired t test, repeated measure ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer tests were used where appropriate. P < 0.05 was accepted as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Propofol has been shown to decrease both cerebral metabolism and blood flow in adults.7 Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide is highly preserved under propofol anesthesia in children.8 These properties make it an ideal anesthetic agent for children undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Due to significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between children and adults however, propofol doses and infusion rates required to achieve a certain target blood concentration are higher for pediatric patients.9,10 In addition, the context-sensitive half-life of propofol is longer in children than in adults, presumably due to altered compartment volumes of distribution.9 This implies that recovery from a propofol infusion may be slower in children than in adults, which may limit its usefulness in prolonged neurosurgical procedures.
Desflurane has pharmacokinetic properties that allow for rapid emergence which is often desirable in the neurosurgical setting. Infants anesthetized with desflurane demonstrated a faster recovery when compared to those anesthetized with isoflurane.11 However, some of the potentially undesirable cerebrovascular properties of desflurane deserve mention. Cerebral blood pressure autoregulation is impaired at 1.0 MAC, and almost completely abolished at 1.5 MAC desflurane in adults.2 Desflurane has been shown to cause a dose-dependent increase in Vmca and HR in children,3 an effect which appears to be enhanced with the addition of nitrous oxide.12 CBFV increases when propofol is replaced with desflurane for maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric patients.13
Factors known to alter CBFV include surgical stimulation, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure, cardiac output, body temperature, and intrathoracic pressure. End-tidal CO2 and body temperature remained constant throughout the study period and the caudal epidural block seemed to eliminate the cerebrovascular response to surgical stimulation.
The absence of any significant change in HR or MAP at the time of desflurane substitution or during emergence of anesthesia in either group is likely due to the fact that remifentanil was used as part of a balanced anesthetic technique. Remifentanil has been shown to attenuate the somatic and hemodynamic responses in children at doses used in the current study.6 A recent pediatric study has demonstrated that remifentanil 0.2 µg·kg1·min1 does not alter CBFV.14 The iv crystalloid administration regimen likely also contributed to the overall hemodynamic stability noted in the current study.
The transient sympathetic hyperactivity observed with desflurane in children is known to persist for up to nine minutes.15 As such, physiologic variables were recorded no earlier than 15 min after desflurane substitution in order to eliminate this source of error and achieve steady-state concentrations.
The increase in variability of Vmca in the desflurane-substituted group needs to be addressed. Desflurane is known to cause cerebral vasodilatation, perhaps even more so than other volatile agents.4,16 Physiologically, measurements of flow during vasodilatation would be expected to exhibit greater variability as compared to vasoconstriction, which has a more finite endpoint.
TCD sonography is a non-invasive and reproducible technique that has been validated as a surrogate measure of cerebral blood flow.17 To reduce inter-patient variability in Vmca measurements, the TCD examination was performed by one of three experienced researchers. Fixing the TCD probe in place using an established frame reduced intra-patient variability.18
In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that desflurane is associated with an increase in CBFV when used to facilitate rapid emergence following a propofol infusion for maintenance of general anesthesia in children. However, this transient increase in CBFV returns to control levels once desflurane is reduced to subanesthetic concentrations during emergence. This should be taken into consideration when contemplating the administration of desflurane in the pediatric neurosurgical setting, particularly in those patients with decreased intracranial compliance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication March 11, 2004. Revision accepted May 18, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Bedforth NM, Girling KJ, Skinner HJ, Mahajan RP. Effects of desflurane on cerebral autoregulation. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 1937.
3 Brenet O, Granry JC, Poirier N, Le Gall R. The effect of desflurane on cerebral blood flow velocity and cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 in children (French). Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1998; 17: 22733.[Medline]
4 Luginbuehl IA, Fredrickson MJ, Karsli C, Bissonnette B. Cerebral blood flow velocity in children anaesthetized with desflurane. Paediatr Anaesth 2003; 13: 496500.[Medline]
5 McFarlan CS, Anderson BJ, Short TG. The use of propofol infusions in paediatric anaesthesia: a practical guide. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 20916.[Medline]
6 Munoz HR, Cortinez LI, Altermatt FR, Dagnino JA. Remifentanil requirements during sevoflurane administration to block somatic and cardiovascular responses to skin incision in children and adults. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 11425.[Medline]
7 Vandesteene A, Trempont V, Engelman E, et al. Effect of propofol on cerebral blood flow and metabolism in man. Anaesthesia 1988; 43(Suppl): 423.
8 Karsli C, Wilson-Smith E, Luginbuehl I, Bissonnette B. The effect of nitrous oxide on cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide in children during propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 6948.
9 Jones RD, Chan K, Andrew LJ. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in children. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65: 6617.
10 Roberts FL, Dixon J, Lewis GT, Tackley RM, Prys-Roberts C. Induction and maintenance of propofol anaesthesia. A manual infusion scheme. Anaesthesia 1988; 43(Suppl): 147.
11 Wolf AR, Lawson RA, Dryden CM, Davies FW. Recovery after desflurane anaesthesia in the infant: comparison with isoflurane. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 3624.
12 Karsli C, Luginbuehl IA, Bissonnette B. The effect of nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow velocity in children anaesthetised with desflurane. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 247.[Medline]
13 Smith JH, Karsli CH, Barlow R, Luginbuehl IA, Bissonnette B. The cerebrovascular effects of changing propofol to desflurane in children. Anesthesiology 2003; A1411 (abstract).
14 Lagace A, Karsli C, Luginbuehl I, Bissonnette B. The effect of remifentanil on cerebral blood flow velocity in children anaesthetized with propofol. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; (in press).
15 Ebert TJ, Muzi M. Sympathetic hyperactivity during desflurane anesthesia in healthy volunteers. A comparison with isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 44453.[Medline]
16 Matta BF, Heath KJ, Tipping K, Summors AC. Direct cerebral vasodilatory effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 67780.[Medline]
17 Sudikoff S, Banasiak K. Techniques for measuring cerebral blood flow in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 1998; 10: 2918.[Medline]
18 Bissonnette B, Benson LN. Closure of persistently patent arterial duct and its impact on cerebral circulatory haemodynamics in children. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 199205.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |