CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDermid, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDermid, R. C.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:846-847 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

Neuroanesthesia and Intensive Care

Best evidence in critical care medicine

Treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism

Robert C. McDermid, MD FRCPC

Edmonton, Alberta


    Article appraised
 TOP
 Article appraised
 Structured abstract
 Commentary by R. C....
 References
 
Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Heusel G, Heinrich F, Kasper W; for the Management Strategies and Prognosis of Pulmonary Embolism-3 Trial Investigators. Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1143–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


    Structured abstract
 TOP
 Article appraised
 Structured abstract
 Commentary by R. C....
 References
 
Background: Thrombolysis is considered to be standard therapy for patients with pulmonary embolism presenting with shock, despite a paucity of large clinical trials. The benefit of thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism (right ventricular dysfunction without shock) is debated.

Question: Is anticoagulation plus thrombolytic therapy more effective than anticoagulation alone for submassive pulmonary embolism?

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 49 German medical centres.

Patients: Two hundred fifty-six normotensive patients (48% male, mean age 62 yr) with proven acute pulmonary embolism and echocardiographic, electrocardiographic or pulmonary artery catheter evidence of right ventricular dysfunction were randomized within 96 hr of presentation. Baseline characteristics were similar save for an excess number of patients with the S1Q3 electrocardiographic pattern in the anticoagulation arm.

Intervention: Patients received 5,000 U unfractionated heparin iv prior to diagnostic workup, followed by alteplase 10 mg iv bolus and 90 mg iv over two hours or matching placebo. Heparin was started in all patients at 1,000 U·hr–1, and titrated to activated partial prothrombin time of two to 2.5 times the upper limit of normal.

Primary end-point: Combined in-hospital mortality or clinical deterioration requiring escalation of treatment (catecholamine infusion, secondary thrombolysis, endotracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or embolectomy/thrombus fragmentation).

Results: Thrombolysis reduced the primary endpoint by 13.7% (P = 0.006, number-needed-to-treat ~7), driven by reduction in the need for secondary thrombolysis. There was no mortality benefit (3.4% vs 2.2%, P = 0.71) or difference in complications and only one fatal bleeding episode (in the anticoagulation arm). Adequacy of anticoagulation was equivalent by 12 hr.

Conclusion: The addition of alteplase to heparin therapy for submassive pulmonary embolism does not reduce mortality, but does reduce the need for escalation of treatment due to clinical deterioration.


    Commentary by R. C. McDermid
 TOP
 Article appraised
 Structured abstract
 Commentary by R. C....
 References
 
There is great interest in thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism with submassive pulmonary embolism due to the association of right ventricular dysfunction and increased mortality.1 The data from Konstantanides et al. indicate that early administration of alteplase is safe and reduces the need for rescue thrombolysis, although mortality is unchanged. The study definition of right ventricular dysfunction was very broad, including echocardiographic (only 31% of patients), pulmonary artery catheter and electrocardiographic criteria.

Right ventricular function appears to improve more rapidly in patients receiving thrombolysis, although this benefit does not persist beyond 72 hr.2 No studies have shown an improvement in embolic burden lasting beyond the first week.3 Thus, the primary benefit of thrombolysis is rapid reduction in right ventricular work and improvement in cardiac output, an effect that may be most important in those patients who have myocardial damage or inadequate tissue perfusion. A recent study has shown that troponin I has prognostic value and is closely linked to echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction.4

Although thrombolysis seems intuitively appropriate for patients with pulmonary embolism and right ventricular dysfunction, the data are not entirely convincing unless it is also accompanied by shock. Close monitoring and immediate thrombolysis when shock develops is an alternative. Further study of thrombolysis for severe subsets of pulmonary embolism is warranted.


    References
 TOP
 Article appraised
 Structured abstract
 Commentary by R. C....
 References
 
1 Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOP-ER). Lancet 1999; 353: 1386–9.[Medline]

2 Vieillard-Baron A, Page B, Augarde R, et al. Acute cor pulmonale in massive pulmonary embolism: incidence, echocardiographic pattern, clinical implications and recovery rate. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 1481–6.[Medline]

3 Wood KE. The presence of shock defines the threshold to initiate thrombolytic therapy in patients with pulmonary embolism. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1537–46.[Medline]

4 Konstantinides S, Giebel A, Olschewski M, et al. Importance of cardiac troponins I and T in risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2002; 106: 1263–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDermid, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDermid, R. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS