CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lukitto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Balki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lukitto, K.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:A25 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004


Abstracts - Monday June 21st 2004 1230-1400

ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH AWAKE CRANIOTOMY

Mrinalini Balki, MBBS, MD, Pirjo Manninen, MD, FRCPC and Karolinah Lukitto, MBBS

Department of Anesthesia, The Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8.

INTRODUCTION:

Awake craniotomy with brain mapping allows for optimal resection of brain tumors close to eloquent cortex. Different anesthetic techniques have been described. The aim of this study was to assess the satisfaction of patients with awake craniotomy performed completely under local anesthesia and conscious sedation.

METHODS:

With IRB approval we prospectively assessed the subjective experience of awake craniotomy by conducting interviews at 1, 4 and 24 hr postoperatively. Patients were questioned about recall of procedure, intraoperative pain, discomfort and anxiety, and overall satisfaction. Anesthetic agents used, perioperative complications, discharge time and outcome were documented.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two patients (16 males, 16 females) with mean ±SD age 47±13yr, weight 76±17kg were studied. All patients had Glasgow Coma Score of 15. Local anesthesia (bupivacaine) was used for insertion of head pins and incision. Conscious sedation included 2.2±1.8mg midazolam (n=32), 599±583mg propofol (n=30), 180±137ug fentanyl (n=31), and 0.25±0.15mg remifentanil (n=13). Duration of procedure was 193±95min. 11 patients (34%) were discharged same day, remainder at 2.2±2.2days. Satisfaction results are in tableGo. At 24 hours 91% of patients were completely satisfied with their experience. For most patients there was consistency in their responses over the 24 hours.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Postoperative patient satisfaction (n=number of patients)
 
DISCUSSION:

Awake craniotomy with local anesthesia and conscious sedation is an acceptable technique that provides good patient satisfaction.

REFERENCE

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001;13:246[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lukitto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Balki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lukitto, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS