CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. CH.
Right arrow Articles by Desai, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. CH.
Right arrow Articles by Desai, S.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:A36 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004


Abstracts - Monday June 21st 2004 1230-1400

THRESHOLD CURRENT IN THE INTRATHECAL SPACE OF CHILDREN

Ban CH. Tsui, MD MSc, Alese M Wagner, BSc, Kirsten Cunningham, MB ChB, Shirley Perry, MScN* and Sunil Desai, MB ChB*

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pediatric Oncology, University of Alberta Hospital and
* Stollery Children’s Hospital, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7

INTRODUCTION

Previously, it was hypothesized that with electrical stimulation it would require < 1mA to observe motor activity in the intrathecal space.1,2 This has been shown in individual case reports and in a porcine model, but never in a formal study. This study was designed to determine the threshold current necessary to elicit motor activity in the intrathecal space of pediatric oncology patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic lumbar punctures.

METHODS

After IRB approval, pediatric oncology patients scheduled for lumbar puncture were recruited. Following sedation with propofol, patients were turned to the lateral position and prepped in a sterile fashion. An 18- or 20-gauge introducer was inserted at the L4-5 level followed by an insulated 24-gauge Pajunck unipolar needle (with a Sprottetip and stylet). The needle was then advanced into the intrathecal space and confirmed by the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). At this point, an independent observer attached the insulated needle to a nerve stimulator and the current was increased until the minimal threshold current for motor activity was observed.

RESULTS

Twenty pediatric oncology patients (ASA II or III) aged 7.9 ± 4.0 years (1.6 yrs-16 yrs) were studied. The mean patient weight was 28.2 ± 15.0 kg. There were 10 male and 10 female patients. The mean current to elicit motor activity in the intrathecal space was 0.6 ± 0.3 mA (range 0.1-1mA). Nineteen twitches were at the L3-5 myotomes and one patient had twitches at L2. 19 twitches were unilateral and 1 was bilateral.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that the mean threshold current necessary to elicit motor response in the intrathecal space of pediatric patients was 0.6 ± 0.3mA and confirms the hypothesis that the minimal threshold current in the intrathecal space is < 1mA. As this differs from the threshold currents reported for electrical stimulation in the epidural space, one may potentially distinguish the epidural space from the intrathecal space.

REFERENCES

1 Anesth Analg 2001;93:1152–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Anesthesiology 2002; A723.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. CH.
Right arrow Articles by Desai, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. CH.
Right arrow Articles by Desai, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS