| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Correspondence |
Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan, E-mail: my3{at}rb4.so-net.ne.jp
To the Editor:
Although many techniques to facilitate the passage of a nasogastric tube (NGT) have been reported, the insertion of an NGT in anesthetized patients can at times be unexpectedly difficult.13 We evaluated a novel approach of using the prone position to facilitate NGT insertion compared with classic insertion in the supine position. The Hospital Ethics Committee approved this protocol, and informed consent was obtained from 45 patients scheduled for elective lumbar supine surgery. After orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia, a 14-French silicon NGT (Create Medic Company, Ltd., Yokohama, Japan) was generously lubricated and inserted in the supine position. The anesthesiologist was permitted to lift the patients tongue jaw, the cricoid cartilage and the thyroid cartilage. The right nostril was filled with the lidocaine jelly, and the NGT was gently inserted into the naris and blindly advanced into the stomach. If the NGT coiled or failed to advance into the stomach on the first attempt, the NGT was withdrawn slightly and secondary insertion was attempted. Placement of the NGT in the stomach was confirmed by the presence of a swooshing sound heard through a stethoscope placed over the stomach while injecting 10 mL of air into the NGT. After a successful insertion or failure twice in the supine position, the NGT was withdrawn slightly, and the patient was turned to the prone Hall-frame position on a lumbar supine surgery table. The patients neck was rotated 45° to the right on the table and the NGT was inserted. The number of successful inserted cases within two attempts at either position was compared. In one patient, neck lateral x-ray imaging was taken in both positions.
The number of successful cases in the prone position (42/45, 93%) was significantly higher than in the supine group (15/45, 33%), (P < 0.01). Cervical x-ray imaging (Figure
) shows that there was sufficient space to pass an NGT at the hypopharynx and esophageal constrictions in the prone position. In this patient, the NGT was coiled at the pharynx, and did not advance to the esophagus in the supine position. However, in the prone position, the NGT was easily advanced into the stomach.
|
References
1 Ozer S, Benumof JL. Oro- and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients: fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 13743.[Medline]
2 Shetty S, Henthorn RW, Ganta R. A method to reduce nasopharyngeal trauma from nasogastric tube placement (Letter). Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 4101.[Medline]
3 Mundy DA. Another technique for insertion of nasogastric tubes (Letter). Anesthesiology 1979; 50: 374.
4 Isono S, Tanaka A, Nishino T. Lateral position decreases collapsibility of the passive pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 7805.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C-W Hung and W-H Lee A novel method to assist nasogastric tube insertion Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 23 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |