CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ioscovich, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ioscovich, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elstein, D.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:737-738 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Images in Anesthesia: Transesophageal echocardiography during Cesarean section in a Marfan’s patient with aortic dissection

Alexander Ioscovich, MD and Deborah Elstein, PhD

Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, E-mail: elstein{at}szmc.org.il

A 29-yr-old 30-week primigravid woman with Marfan’s syndrome presented to the emergency room with chest, back, and epigastric pain. Echocardiography three months earlier had shown mild aortic dilatation (37 mm) and mitral valve prolapse. Both transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computer tomography confirmed aortic dissection from the take-off of the left subclavian artery that extended past the bifurcation and to the iliac arteries. The patient was hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) near the cardiothoracic surgery department for invasive monitoring that confirmed acute (Stanford) type B aortic dissection.1 Antihypertensive, sedative, and steroid therapy were administered immediately. Three days later, because of exacerbation of pain, the patient was scheduled for Cesarean section with preparation for aortic replacement in case of expansion of the dissection into the aortic arch or other unexpected and untoward complications. General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol, and rocuronium to minimize cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation, and the TEE probe was immediately positioned to monitor the condition of the dissection (video available at www.cja-jca.org). The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout delivery and was returned to the ICU for continuous conservative treatment. Two weeks later she was discharged in good health. The baby suffered from bilateral hydronephrosis (no genetic information available to date) and mild aortic arch abnormalities compatible with Marfan’s syndrome.

In the past, women with Marfan’s syndrome were counseled to avoid the risk of pregnancy and delivery. Today, with improved means of identifying patients that facilitate better care, increased longevity, and improved quality of life, more women with Marfan’s syndrome are attempting to have babies, despite the high risk of aortic dissection even in the absence of aortic root dilatation prior to pregnancy. For this reason, intraoperative TEE observation ensures an extra measure of real-time control during Cesarean section, particularly in case of acute or chronic aortic dissection, and risk factors such as aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm,2 worsening of dilatation, and/or further compromise in cardiac function in the perinatal period.3 Potentially, TEE may be recommended for intraoperative real-time control of the aortic state during non-cardiovascular surgery in patients with Marfan’s syndrome, thereby obviating surgical intervention when not absolutely necessary.




View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE A, B Image taken three days before delivery at the level of the thoracic aorta.

 

    References
 TOP
 References
 
1 Brar HB. Anaesthetic management of a caesarean section in a patient with Marfan’s syndrome and aortic dissection. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001; 29: 67–70.[Medline]

2 Lind J, Wallenburg HC. The Marfan syndrome and pregnancy: a retrospective study in a Dutch population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 98: 28–35.[Medline]

3 Rahman J, Rahman FZ, Rahman W, al-Suleiman SA, Rahman MS. Obstetric and gynecologic complications in women with Marfan syndrome. J Reprod Med 2003; 48: 723–8.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ioscovich, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ioscovich, A.
Right arrow Articles by Elstein, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS