| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Correspondence |
Hôtel Dieu, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, France, E-mail : jebazin{at}chu-clermontferrand.fr
To the Editor:
We read with great interest Naja et al.s recent article1 regarding pudendal block with nerve stimulator guidance, and offer the following comments. This is the first randomized study demonstrating the efficacy of such blocks in providing postoperative analgesia following hemorroidectomy.
However, we are surprised by the landmarks proposed by the authors. Why did they use two injection points side by side?
We usually use this block for gynecological surgery (bartholin cyst removal and perineal surgery) and we use only one injection point at the intersection of a horizontal line running with the medial edge of the ischial tuberosity from the superior aspect of the anus.2 In our experience, the mean depth of stimulation is 45.1 ± 11.6 mm (2580) and the mean stimulation intensity is 0.6 ± 0.1 mA (0.51).
Motor responses are :
In our opinion, the risk of the posterior injection points is an extension of the block to the sciatic nerve. This risk must be considered with a bilateral injection in ambulatory patients.
References
1 Naja Z, Ziade MF, Lönnqvist PA. Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 628.
2 Bolandard F. Pudendal nerve block with nerve stimulation. In: Gaertner E, Al Nasser B, Choquet O, et al. (Eds). Regional Anaesthesia: Truncular and Plexus Anaesthesia in Adults. Arnette; 2004: 2137.
Related articles in CJA:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |