| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Correspondence |
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, E-mail: abaraka{at}aub.edu.lb
Thank you for referring the letter of Charma et al. concerning our report "Prophylactic methylene blue in a patient with congenital methemoglobinemia.1
Our patient had severe congenital methemoglobinemia as evidenced by a methemoglobin level of 15.9%. The case was scheduled on two previous occasions for turbinectomy, but was cancelled because of the development of severe hypoxemia during induction of anesthesia.1,2
On this occasion, the patient was preoxygenated prior to induction of anesthesia resulting in an increase of the PaO2 from 81.3 to 543 mmHg, associated with an increase of the functional oxygen saturation (SaO2) [O2Hb / O2HB + RHb x 100%] from 96.2% to 99.7%. However, as shown in the Table
, the fractional oxygen saturation (SfO2) [O2Hb / O2Hb + RHb + COHb + MetHb x 100%] which reflects the actual oxyhemoglobin saturation, only increased from 80.9% to 84.1%. Thus, preoxygenation alone did not provide an adequate margin of safety against hypoxemia. It was only after the administration of methylene blue that SfO2 increased up to 94.7%, associated with a significant decrease of the methemoglobin level from 15.9% to 5%.
|
References
1 Baraka AS, Ayoub CM, Yazbeck-Karam V, et al. Prophylactic methylene blue in a patient with congenital methemoglobinemia. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 25861.
2 Baraka AS, Ayoub CM, Kaddoum RN, Maalouli JM,Chehab IR, Hadi UM. Severe oxyhemoglobin desaturation during induction of anesthesia in a patient with congenital methemoglobinemia. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 12967.[Medline]
Related articles in CJA:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |