| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* From the Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care,
Pneumology; and the
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Regional University Hospital Center of Tours, Tours, France.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Martine Ferrandière, Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Trousseau, CHU de Tours, 37044 Tours cedex, France. Phone: +33 2 47478551; Fax: +33 2 47474660; E-mail: ferrandiere{at}med.univ-tours.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical features: A morbidly obese patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease underwent prostate surgery in the lithotomy position under spinal anesthesia. Hypoxemia was encountered during surgery, and a profound decrease of forced vital capacity associated with alveolar hypoventilation and ventilation/perfusion mismatching were observed. In the operating room, an M-mode sonographic study of the right diaphragm was performed, which confirmed that after spinal anesthesia and assuming the lithotomy position, there was a large decrease (30%) in diaphragmatic excursion. Hypoxemia and alveolar hypoventilation were successfully treated with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.
Conclusions: Intraoperative application of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation improved diaphragmatic excursion and overall respiratory function, and reduced clinical discomfort in this patient.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulmonary function tests and ABG were performed on the day prior to surgery to evaluate any further progression of the patients pulmonary disease, as well as his ability to tolerate LP and SA. The results demonstrated severe COPD without a reversible component of airflow obstruction: measured total lung capacity 8.8 L, predicted 123%; measured forced vital capacity (FVC) 2.9 L, predicted 65%; measured forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1) 0.9 L, predicted 27% (unchanged after albuterol challenge); measured FEV1/vital capacity 0.3, predicted 44%; measured mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of FVC 0.3 L·sec1, predicted 9%; measured carbon monoxide transfer factor/alveolar volume 3.9, predicted 103%. Arterial blood gas values demonstrated pronounced respiratory insufficiency: pH 7.4; PaO2 47 mmHg, PaCO2 55 mmHg, SaO2 81%. Respiratory effects of positioning and LP were assessed using a dentists chair to mimic patient positioning during surgery. The following were measured after 15 min in both sitting and LP: respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow, FVC, ABG, the alveolo-arterial O2 gradient calculated as: (Aa)DO2 = [150(PaCO2/0.8)]PaO2, and a respiratory discomfort score, using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (no dyspnea) to 10 (maximal dyspnea). In the LP, room air ABG values deteriorated, and FVC was reduced (Table
). However, the patients subjective level of discomfort was nearly unchanged. Intraoperative repetition of these respiratory tests were proposed to the patient.
|
Spinal anesthesia was associated with a marked deterioration of FVC and ABG values (Table
). The patients subjective discomfort increased. In the operating room, an M-mode sonographic study of the right diaphragm (Acuson XP 128, 3.5 MHZ probe; Mountain View, CA, USA) was performed at two different times in LP: before coming in the operating theatre, and after SA (sensory blockade T10). Measurement protocols were those previously described by Ayoub et al.1 Ten cycles of quiet ventilation and three inspiratory capacities were recorded during pulmonary function test measurements. The Figure illustrates the diaphragmatic inspiratory slope at baseline (Figure
, panel A), after SA and LP (Figure
, panel B), and during NiPPV (Figure
, panel C). After SA and LP, there was a large decrease (30%) in diaphragmatic excursion during inspiratory capacities.
|
At the end of surgery, the patient was admitted to the postanesthesia care unit, and monitored in a 45° head-up position as SA wore off (duration of blockade: 150 min). Non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation was then withdrawn, and the patient was discharged from the postanesthesia care unit (Table
). His postoperative course was uneventful.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transurethral prostatectomy requires a relatively low level of sensory blockade (T10) and is well managed with SA, particularly given the additional advantage of ease of early diagnosis of transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome. On the other hand, transurethral resection of the prostate is commonly performed in LP which may be associated with compromised respiratory function in some patients. The LP increases pressure on the diaphragm, leading to cephalad displacement which may influence the balance between abdominal and chest wall motion.3 Tidal volume may be decreased by 3% and vital capacity by 18%4 in LP, which may lead to respiratory failure in susceptible patients.
However, Reber et al. have observed that, compared with the supine position, functional residual capacity did not change significantly with LP, and lung aeration (spiral computed tomography scans of the lungs) was not significantly affected by LP. There were no changes in the amount of poorly aerated lung tissues, and the ventilation/perfusion distribution and ABG were similar. In one patient (body mass index 29 kg·m2) who was studied in LP during epidural anesthesia, atelectasis and shunt increased. Shunt was also increased in two other patients with high body mass index placed in the supine position during epidural anesthesia.5
Some authors argue that LP favours cranial displacement of the diaphragm, which may restore the diaphragmatic length to near optimal values.6 In obese patients, this beneficial effect is negated by the increase in abdominal pressure observed after LP. Although the respiratory consequences of LP in patients with high body mass index have not been specifically studied, they appear to be associated with a reduction in diaphragmatic movement, reduction in respiratory compliance, and a restrictive ventilatory defect.7 Obesity may also induce respiratory insufficiency because of the decrease in thoraco-pulmonary compliance and functional residual capacity, and obstruction of distal airways. In addition, its association with COPD is not rare.8
The detrimental effects of SA, in our patient (Table
, column 2 vs column 3), are complex. Compared with the preoperative period, the position was replicated exactly. Spinal anesthesia was stable at a low level: T10. Spinal anesthesia with a low level of blockade is ordinarily associated with preserved respiratory function. In patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency, however, neuraxial blockade may result in intercostal muscle weakness, hypoventilation, and impaired cough.9
The case we present illustrates the extent to which the association of obesity, LP and SA, may aggravate a preexisting respiratory insufficiency. Alone, neither obesity, COPD, LP or SA limited to T10 are reliably associated with impending respiratory failure, but their additive effects have not been studied, and can be hypothesized to be either additive or synergistic. Our patient suffered from severe respiratory insufficiency, with marked hypoxemia and hypercapnia at baseline. The preoperative evaluation showed that LP without anesthesia induced a measurable decrease in diaphragmatic excursion and exacerbated hypoxemia because of a worsening in restrictive and obstructive defects. A further and similar aggravation was observed after SA (Table
), despite a stable low level of blockade at T10.
We observed that the intraoperative application of NiPPV improved diaphragmatic excursion and overall respiratory function. Non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation fully corrected hypoxemia, FVC, and reduced clinical discomfort in this patient. We chose NiPPV rather than oxygen supplementation, because our previous experience with this patient demonstrated hypoventilation in response to oxygen therapy.
The rise in CO2 levels that occur with oxygen therapy in severe COPD patients is due to a complex combination of the effects of hypoxic pulmonary vaso-constriction on venous admixture and alveolar dead-space, and the Haldane effect.1013 The Haldane effect refers to decreased carriage of CO2 by oxyhemoglobin, and to increased CO2 release in the presence of oxygen.11 Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction optimizes the distribution of ventilation/perfusion ratios, and minimizes the physiologic deadspace, improving the efficiency of CO2 exchange at low FIO2.10 When FIO2 increases, on the other hand, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is less effective and the pulmonary vascular resistance decreases. The result is an increase in alveolar deadspace.
In our patient, NiPPV proved to be a more effective treatment of hypoxemia and hypercarbia than oxygen supplementation. The aim of NiPPV is to decrease the inspiratory effort and the work of breathing via constant pressure support. In our particular situation, positive pressure ventilation may also have counteracted the increased abdominal pressure induced by LP. The usefulness of non-invasive ventilation via a face mask in the operating room, during regional anesthesia, has not been studied previously. Only one study has used pressure support ventilation during general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway.14 We believe that NiPPV associated with SA is a valuable alternative to general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation in borderline patients suffering from chronic lung disease who may be candidates for regional anesthesia, but who demonstrate worsening of their condition in response to oxygen therapy alone. Our sonographic study suggests that these beneficial respiratory effects may result from an improvement in diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion.
In conclusion, we report a case of impending intra-operative respiratory failure associated with hypoxemia, severe COPD, obesity, LP, and SP (tenth thoracic dermatome). We demonstrate that a possible mechanism of hypoxemia may be a diaphragmatic dysfunction, and suggest that NiPPV may be a logical and efficient method for avoiding endotracheal intubation in these patients during surgery. This hypothesis awaits further studies to establish its clinical significance.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 19791990. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 27784.[Medline]
3 Don HF, Craig DB, Wahba WM, Couture JG. The measurement of gas trapped in the lungs at functional residual capacity and the effects of posture. Anesthesiology 1971; 35: 58290.[Medline]
4 Case E II, Stiles JA. The effect of various surgical positions on vital capacity. Anesthesiology 1946; 7: 2931.
5 Reber A, Bein T, Högman M, Khan ZP, Nilsson S, Hedenstierna G. Lung aeration and pulmonary gas exchange during lumbar epidural anaesthesia and in the lithotomy position in elderly patients. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 85461.[Medline]
6 Giesecke AH Jr, Cale JO, Jenkins MT. The prostate, ventilation, and anesthesia. JAMA 1968; 203: 38991.[Medline]
7 Wilcox S, Vandam LD. Alas, poor Trendelenburg and his position! A critique of its uses and effectiveness. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 5748.
8 Benumof JL. Obesity, sleep apnea, the airway and anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2004; 17: 2130.[Medline]
9 Rock P, Rich PB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2003; 16: 12331.
10 Aubier M, Murciano D, Milic-Emili J, et al. Effects of the administration of O2 on ventilation and blood gases in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 122: 74754.[Medline]
11 Houston JG, Morris AD, Howie CA, Reid JL, McMillan N. Technical report: quantitative assessment of diaphragmatic movement--a reproducible method using ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1992; 46: 4057.[Medline]
12 Lenfant C. Arterial-alveolar difference in PCO2 during air and oxygen breathing. J Appl Physiol 1966; 21: 135662.
13 Hanson CW III, Marshal BE, Frasch H, Marshall C. Causes of hypercarbia with oxygen therapy in patients with chronic obstructive disease. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 238.[Medline]
14 Brimacombe J, Keller C, Hormann C. Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure with the laryngeal mask airway: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 16213.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Terblanche, C. Maxwell, J. Keunen, and J. C. A. Carvalho Obstetric and Anesthetic Management of Severe Congenital Myasthenia Syndrome Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1313 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |