| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* From the Radiology Residency Training Program, University of Toronto, Toronto; Ontario, Canada;
Kings College London, School of Medicine, University of London, London, UK; and the
Department of Anesthesia, the University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Mark Baerlocher, 13 Marshview Drive, Sackville, New Brunswick E4L 3B2, Canada. Phone: 416-508-0159; E-mail: mark.baerlocher{at}utoronto.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Gender-specific data were obtained from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS), and the Program Director from each of the 16 Canadian Anesthesiology Residency Training Programs.
Results: The ratio of practicing female:male anesthesiologists increased from 0.29:1 in 1998 to 0.34:1 in 2005. The ratio was greatest in the youngest age grouping (< 45 yr), at 0.49:1, and lowest in the > 64 age group, at 0.16:1. As of the 20042005 academic year, there were 201 women in a Canadian anesthesiology residency program vs 316 males, a female:male ratio of 0.64:1. Female medical students were less likely to rank anesthesiology residency as their first choice in the annual CaRMS match as compared to their male counterparts; a mean of 21 female medical students ranked an English anesthesiology residency program as their first choice in the CaRMS match, vs a mean of 35 males, from 19932005 (inclusive).
Conclusions: The number (and female:male ratio) of women in anesthesiology in Canada is increasing gradually. However, more males continue to enter the field than women. This may be explained by a lower number of women who rank anesthesiology as their first choice in the annual CaRMS match.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With equalization of the numbers of men and women within medical school, one might expect the number of women entering anesthesiology to increase concomitantly. However, it is also possible that more women are instead entering other specialties: it is clear, for example, that family medicine is the most popular career choice for female medical students.4
In this descriptive study, we explore the issue of "feminization" of anesthesiology in Canada. Specifically, we sought to determine whether or not the gender distribution of anesthesiologists in Canada has changed during the past decade. As a related issue, we also sought to determine the prioritization pattern of medical students, by gender, who ranked anesthesiology as their first choice in the Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The database included both part-time and full-time anesthesiologists (i.e., RCPSC-certified) practicing in academic and community hospital settings in Canada. Data relating to family-practice anesthetists were not included in this study. Summary data are presented as ratios.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the 20042005 academic year, men outnumbered women within anesthesiology residency training programs, with 201 women vs 316 men, a ratio of 0.64:1 (Table III
). Two of the three French programs (lUniversité de Montréal, and lUniversité de Sherbrooke), and the program at Queens University have more women than men (female:male ratios of 1.44:1, 2.7:1, and 1.1:1 respectively). The lowest female:male ratio was observed in the program at the University of Western Ontario (0.30:1).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Within the practice of anesthesiology in Canada, the current female:male ratio is approximately 0.34:1. This represents a modest increase from a female:male ratio of 0.29:1 observed in 1998. Categorized by age, the ratio of female:male anesthesiologists practicing in Canada is greatest within the youngest age groupings: one in three anesthesiologists under the age of 45 is female (a female:male ratio of 0.49:1), vs one in six over the age of 64 (a female:male ratio of 0.16:1; Table II
). A discrepancy regarding the number of certified anesthesiologists presented in Tables I
and II
is due to the fact that retired anesthesiologists were included in the data base of Figure II.
The lower number of female anesthesiology residents reflects a proportionately lower application rate by women. This is seen in both the absolute number of women ranking anesthesiology programs as their first choice, as well as the percentage of the total female applicant pool, compared to males. The pattern of female:male ratios of applicants over the past 13 years has not been consistent. However, we project that the female:male ratio of anesthesiologists in clinical practice will continue to increase, possibly approaching an equilibrium value near 0.67:1. This projection may not apply to the three French programs, as data from these centres are not available through the CaRMS match.
A previous study has shown an absence of gender discrimination at the level of Canadian residency selection committees.4 This matter was not evaluated in the current study. However, potential factors possibly dissuading female medical students from selecting a career in anesthesiology must be considered. For example, lifestyle factors such as pressure to start a family may play a role, particularly during residency training. There is no question, for example, that proportionately more female medical students rank family medicine as their top choice in the CaRMS matching program,4 and the shorter training period is an important determinant.
Strategies to attract more female applicants to anesthesiology are complex, and issues related to family planning, and the prolonged specialty training program are important considerations.6 In a survey of 946 members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists Society conducted in 1998, Jenkins and Wong reported that women were as satisfied with their professional careers as their male counterparts.7 In a South African study, Gardner et al.8 reported that female anesthesiologists have high career satisfaction; however they also reported that women are more likely to report gender discrimination and harassment. It may be possible, to increase attraction to the specialty by examining such factors such as work-related stress, and ability to influence the work environment.9 Providing the option of practicing on a part-time basis is another factor which departments must also consider.
Finally, increasing numbers of women entering anesthesiology will create additional issues: the recent Ryten report10 found that female anesthesiologists work fewer hours than their male counterparts until the age of 55, particularly in the youngest age groups. Female anesthesiologists between the ages of 30 and 39 work, on average, 70% less than male anesthesiologists. As the changing gender balance leads to an increasing female:male ratio amongst anesthesiologists, there may be additional human resource implications for the specialty of anesthesia.
There are several limitations to this study. First, the data in Table III
provide only a snapshot of the gender ratios amongst anesthesiology residents for the year 2005. Essentially, the ratios shown represent an average of the gender ratio over 5 years, Post-Graduate Years 15. Second, the data shown in Figures 1
and 2
refer only to males and females who ranked an anesthesia program as their top choice, and does not take into account those who ranked an anesthesia program as their second or lower choices.
In conclusion, there is an increase in the number (and an increase in the female:male ratio) of practicing female anesthesiologists in Canada. Although the number of female specialists continues to rise, the application rate to anesthesiology residency training programs continues to be lower amongst graduating female medical students compared to that of their male counterparts. Steps to equalize the gender distribution of anesthesiologists in Canada should examine measures to ensure the specialty is able to recruit effectively from the cohort of graduating medical students.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared
Accepted for publication October 26, 2005. Revision accepted November 30, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Levinson W, Lurie N. When most doctors are women: what lies ahead? Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 4714.
3 Sibbald B. "Feminization of medicine - people say it like its a bad thing". CMAJ 2002; 167: 914.
4 Baerlocher MO, Detsky AS. Are applicants to Canadian residency programs rejected because of their sex? CMAJ 2005; 173: 143940.
5 Baerlocher MO, Walker M. Does gender impact upon success rate amongst Canadian radiology residency applicants? CARJ 2005; 56: 23237.
6 Strange Khursandi DC. Unpacking the burden: gender issues in anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998; 26: 7885.[Medline]
7 Jenkins K, Wong D. A survey of professional satisfaction among Canadian anesthesiologists. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 63745.
8 Gardner SV, James MF, Evans NR. Gender issues among South African anaesthetists. S Afr Med J 2002; 92: 7326.[Medline]
9 Frank E, McMurray JE, Linzer M, Elon L. Career satisfaction of US women physicians: results from the Women Physicians Health Study. Society of General Internal Medicine Career Satisfaction Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 141726.
10 Ryten E. A physician workforce planning model for the specialty of anesthesia: theoretical and practical considerations. Available from URL; http://www.anesthesia.org/acuda/en/ryten.html.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Douglas Gender ratio and the specialty of anesthesia/La proportion hommes-femmes et la specialite d'anesthesie. Can J Anesth, May 1, 2006; 53(5): 427 - 431. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |