CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tousignant, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tousignant, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:26016 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006


Sunday June 18

26016 - TRICUSPID ANNULAR VELOCITIES IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Claude Tousignant, MD, Richard Bowry, MB BS and Andrew Miller, MB BS

St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ONTARIO, Canada

INTRODUCTION: Tricuspid annular motion has been used to assess right ventricular (RV) systolic function(1). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of heart rate (HR) on the load independent isovolemic acceleration (IVA) and load dependent systolic descent velocity (S wave)(2). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were used.

METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, 22 post cardiac surgery patients with AF were enrolled. Using a GE vivid 7 with 1.7/3.4 MHz probe, an apical four chamber view was obtained. A tissue Doppler color sector was applied to the lateral tricuspid annulus. 8 loops of at least 20 cycles with a frame rate >200 fps were recorded and stored digitally. Using echopac quantitative analysis software a 6 x 6mm sample was placed on the ventricular side of the tricuspid annulus and adjusted to maximize the S wave velocity. For each beat, IVA (m/s2) and peak S wave velocity (cm/s) were measured (figure 1AGo) and the corresponding heart rate (HR) was calculated from the preceding R-R interval. At least 40 beats were measured per patient. Best-fit regression was used to assess the relationship between HR and both IVA and S wave velocity. The measurements were divided into HR groups (figure 1BGo) and analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance on ranks.


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
RESULTS: 7 patients were excluded from analysis, there were 12 males and 3 females, average age: 66±12 years. In all, 715 beats were analyzed. There was no difference in IVA between groups 1 and 2. In groups 3 to 5 IVA increased significantly when compared to each previous HR group (p<0.05) (figure 1BGo). There was no significant difference in S wave velocity in groups 1 to 3. The S wave velocity was significantly lower in groups 4 and 5 when compared to groups 1 and 2. (p<0.05) (figure 1BGo). For all patients, there was a positive linear correlation between IVA and HR (r=0.49, p<0.001). For S wave and HR, best fit was achieved using a second order polynomial equation (r=0.50, p<0.001).

DISCUSSION: As the HR increased, there was a significant rise in the IVA when HR was above 100 bpm and a significant reduction in the S wave with HR greater than 120 bpm. The observed increases in IVA were likely the result of the Bowditch effect(3). For the S wave, the decrease was likely due to limitations in preload due to HR. Indeed the S wave may have fallen faster in patients with lower volume status. When all the data were pooled, there was only a modest correlation for IVA and S wave when compared to HR, possibly the result of variable RV systolic dysfunction and preload. Tricuspid annular motion may be useful in assessing RV systolic function however, when HR exceeds 100 bpm the increase in IVA needs to be taken in consideration. HR-induced preload limitations were likely the cause of the decrease in S wave.

REFERENCES:

1 Am Heart J 2000 139: 710–15[Medline]

2 Circulation 2002 5: 1693–99

3 Arb Physiol Aust Leipzig 1871 6: 139–176





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tousignant, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tousignant, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS