CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:26449 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006


Tuesday June 20

26449 - MINIMUM EFFECTIVE DOSE OF REMIFENTANIL FOR PEDIATRIC LUMBAR PUNCTURE

Jason Hayes, MD, Mauro Arrica, MD, Alejandra Lopez, MD, James Robertson and Mark Crawford, MBBS

The Hospital For Sick Children, Toronto, ONTARIO, Canada

INTRODUCTION: The administration of propofol for lumbar puncture (LP) is common in pediatric oncology patients. Propofol has no analgesic properties, and as a result patients often respond to the pain of LP needle insertion. Also, propofol may produce myoclonic movements that can make the procedure more difficult to perform. Remifentanil is an ultra-short acting opioid which can be used to provide analgesia and sedation for short painful procedures with minimal residual pain. The combination of propofol and remifentanil may be particularly suitable for short duration procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum effective dose of remifentanil required to prevent movement during LP when co-administered with propofol 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg (P2 or P4).

METHODS: After obtaining REB approval, 24 unpremedicated children aged 3–11 years undergoing elective LP have been studied to date. No topical anesthetic cream was applied to the skin over the lumbar region. Patients were randomly assigned to group P2 or P4 using a random number table. Anesthesia was induced with propofol followed immediately by remifentanil. The initial dose of remifentanil in each group was 1.0 µg/kg in group P2 and 0.5 µg/kg in group P4. Subsequent doses of remifentanil were determined by the Dixon up-and-down method using a dose interval of 0.25 µg/kg.1 The LP needle was introduced at 90 seconds after propofol administration. Patients were given a rescue bolus of propofol 1.0 mg/kg if required. Occurrence of purposeful movement, duration of procedure, duration of apnea, and episodes of bradycardia or hypotension were recorded.

RESULTS: Patient age, weight, and duration of procedure are shown in the tableGo. Using the Dixon up-and-down method, our preliminary data suggest that the minimum effective dose of remifentanil that prevents movement when co-administered with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and 4.0 mg/kg is 1.00 ± 0.19 µg/kg and 0.46 ± 0.19 µg/kg, respectively. The duration of apnea for patients who did not move was 56 ± 21 s in group P2 and 49 ± 38 s in group P4. There were no episodes of bradycardia or hypotension in either group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
DISCUSSION: Preliminary data suggest that the administration of propofol and remifentanil provides effective anesthesia for pediatric patients undergoing LP. Minimum effective doses of remifentanil when used in combination with propofol 2 and 4 mg/kg are 1.00 ± 0.19 µg/kg and 0.46 ± 0.19 µg/kg, respectively.

REFERENCES:

1 Statistics in Endocrinology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1970: 251–267.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS