CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abouzahr, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abouzahr, L.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 53:26480 (2006)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2006


Sunday June 18

26480 - VALVE REPAIR IS FEASIBLE IN COMPLEX MITRAL PATHOLOGY

Ashraf Fayad, FCARCSI FACC and Labib Abouzahr

University Of Ottawa, Ottawa, ONTARIO, Canada

Introduction: Repair of the mitral valve is generally accepted as the preferred surgical treatment for patients with mitral regurgitation. Complex mitral valve pathology continues to pose significant operative challenges, particularly in patients with bileaflet involvement. This study examines our experience of mitral valve repair, including patients with anterior or bi- leaflet pathology.

Methods: All patients undergoing mitral valve preserving procedures by a single surgeon between 1999 and 2004 were included in this study on an intention-to-treat basis, guided by pre-operative echocardiography. Data was prospectively collected and analyzed using SPSS 10.0. Eighty-one patients underwent leaflet or sub-valvular apparatus repair with a mean age of 66 (range: 37–86). At least one episode of congestive heart failure occurred in 52% of patients with 56% of the entire group having a New York Heart Association class of III or IV. LV function was grade I in 67% of cases and 53% had pulmonary hypertension.

Results: Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality was 2.5% (2 patients), with one patient presenting with acute ischemic ventricular septal defect, and the other suffering cerebral vascular accident post urgent combined coronary and mitral procedure. Valvular pathology included degenerative (84%), ischemic (7%), infectious (6%) and rheumatic (2%). Forty-six percent of repairs involved only the posterior leaflet, 16% only the anterior, and 38% involved bileaflet repair. Ninety-five percent of intended repairs were successfully completed intra-operatively. There were 4 conversions to replacement. Ninety-six percent of patients who underwent mitral repair had mild or less mitral regurgitation and a significant decrease in LV end-diastolic dimension (5.95 vs. 5.32 cm., mean) at late follow up (p<0.001).

Discussion: Our experience demonstrates that repair of complex mitral pathology is safe and successfully achieved in the vast majority of patients.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abouzahr, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abouzahr, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS