CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dohgomori, H.
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dohgomori, H.
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:246 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007


Correspondence

Application of normal saline to ultrasonography as an alternative to gel for internal jugular venous cannulation

Hiroshi Dohgomori, MD, Masato Shiba, MD and Kazufumi Okamoto, MD

Shinshu University Hospital, Asahi, Matsumoto, Japan E-mail: hd5621hd{at}yahoo.co.jp

To the Editor:

Percutaneous central venous catheterization can be facilitated with real-time observation of vessels using 2-D ultrasonography. Various methods have been described when using this technique,14 each of which incorporates gel application to the referred skin area in order to ensure adequate delivery of the echo beam to the deep tissues.1 While the use of gel is common, its safety for central venous cannulation has not been clearly established. Furthermore, difficulties may be associated with catheter handling as gel solutions may make the catheter slip in the operator’s hands, and there is potential for an increased infection rate.5 Saline may be an effective, less expensive alternative to gel.

Recently, for a patient undergoing central venous cannulation with ultrasonography, we compared images using sterile normal saline and gel on the referred skin surface. Ultrasonography of the right internal jugular vein (IJV) was performed using a GE Book XP (General Electrics Ltd, USA) equipped with an 8- MHz probe, from which we obtained three different views. We first covered the probe tightly with a sterilized silicon glove containing gel. After covering the skin area with gel, we obtained a view that could distinguish between the carotid artery and the IJV (FigureGo, panel A). Next, the skin was thoroughly cleaned and the probe was re-applied without gel on the skin area. We could not obtain a clear image that would be suitable for IJV catheterization (FigureGo, panel B). Finally, we applied sterile normal saline over the skin, which generated an ultrasonographic image (FigureGo, panel C) very similar to that obtained with the gel.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE Panel A) The view obtained by using gel on the skin surface (conventional method), where the CA and IJV are easily distinguished. The probe was lubricated with gel and then wrapped in a sterile glove. Panel B) View obtained without gel or saline. Panel C) View obtained with sterile normal saline applied to the skin surface. The CA and IJV are readily visualized. The gel covered only the surface of the probe within a sterile glove (it did not directly touch the skin surface). CA = carotid arter y; IJV = internal jugular vein).

 
These observations suggest that a more detailed examination of normal saline as a substitute for skin application, compared to gel solutions to facilitate ultrasound-guided techniques for IJV cannulation, is warranted.

Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 19, 2006.

References

1 Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR. Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 148–58.[Medline]

2 Milling T, Holden C, Melniker L, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta T. Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13: 245–7.[Medline]

3 DiCarlo JV, Auerbach SR, Alexander SR. Clinical review: alternative vascular access techniques for continuous hemofiltration. Crit Care 2006; 10: 230.[Medline]

4 McGee DC, Gould MK. Complications of central venous catheterizations. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1123–33.[Free Full Text]

5 Ohara T, Itoh Y, Itoh K. Ultrasound instruments as possible vectors of staphylococcal infection. J Hosp Infect 1998; 40: 73–7.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dohgomori, H.
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dohgomori, H.
Right arrow Articles by Okamoto, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS