| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
University of Alberta Hospitals, Edmonton, Canada E-mail: btsui{at}ualberta.ca
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this Images in Anesthesia feature, ultrasound images (MicroMaxx, SonoSite Inc, Bothel, WA, USA; HFL38 or SLA, 13-6MHz linear probe) obtained from a male adult cadaver [body mass index (BMI) 28 and embalmed six months previously in the usual manner (using a solution containing a combination of 4% formaldehyde, 95% ethanol, glycerol, phenol and water that was perfused under pressure through the femoral artery) at the authors institution] are compared to the images from an adult male (BMI 22). The cadaver was in legal custody of the Division of Anatomy of the authors institution. The embalming and imaging procedures were performed with permission from the Division of Anatomy in compliance with the institutional ethical standards for the use of human material in medical education. Ethics approval was obtained from the local Institutional Research Ethics Board for ultrasound scanning on the volunteer (one of the authors).
In addition to demonstrating the similarity between cadaveric and live imaging, some of the site-specific benefits and obstacles related to scanning the cadaveric specimen are highlighted. These images also consider several non-traditional block locations (i.e., radial nerve at the elbow and ulnar nerve at mid-forearm). Although these sites can be used for either hand surgery/procedures or rescue analgesia,9,10 their safety and efficacy have not been evaluated in any large study.
The following notes are related to all of the figures: 1) the number (depth in centimetres) in the far right lower corner of each image indicates that the images were taken at similar depths and show equal magnification for both cadaveric and live subjects; 2) the needle is shown in the clinical pictures to illustrate technique, particularly probe placement, but the needle was not used during the scans and will not be found in the image; and finally, 3) the cadaveric images have minimal labelling to minimize obstruction of view.
|
Blocks above the clavicle (Figure 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Brachial plexus below the clavicle (Figure 2 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Terminal nerves in the periphery (Figure 3 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
While imaging in cadavers may not be ideal in all cases,13 most images can be interpreted to a reasonable extent and can be useful for training purposes. Although using special solutions or fresh (unembalmed) cadavers may provide better imaging and improved manipulation for easier access to some areas (e.g., neck), these would likely increase the cost significantly and limit widespread availability. The clarity of the images in this article illustrates that the cadavers available through most medical schools and embalmed in the usual manner can be useful for teaching these specialized techniques. In fact, this learning model may also provide excellent opportunities for introducing and teaching medical students ultrasonographic anatomy as well as its clinical application in regional anesthesia. Limitations include the inability to use nerve stimulation for confirming specific nerve localization, and the lack of pulsatile arteries for Doppler confirmation. Artificial pulses have been generated via pneumatic devices and may be beneficial for regional anesthesia training in cadavers; this simulation requires tissue incision and a catheter for balloon insufflation,14 both of which may interfere with ultrasound imaging.
Many of the images shown here contain easily identifiable vessels regardless of their static nature. Many regional anesthesia training programs need improvement15 and using cadavers more frequently as training models could be useful for teaching the relevant anatomy and methodology of traditional blocks (through dissections and needling practice) as well as ultrasound-guided techniques (through static and real-time imaging and needling practice). The opportunity to use a stress-free preclinical setting to practice the intricacies of both needle-probe alignment and dynamic needle tracking within the target tissue could be of great value.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication February 13, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Kessler J, Bolger AF, Gray AT. An essential skill. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 498500.[Medline]
3 Lirk P, Colvin JM, Biebl M, et al. Evaluation of a cadaver workshop for education in regional anesthesia (German). Anaesthesist 2005; 54: 32732.[Medline]
4 Broking K, Waurick R. How to teach regional anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19: 52630.[Medline]
5 Gray AT. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current state of the art. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 36873, discussion 5A.[Medline]
6 Tsui BC, Dillane D. Needle puncture site and a "walkdown" approach for short-axis alignment during ultrasound- guided blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 5867.[Medline]
7 Tsui BC, Twomey C, Finucane BT. Visualization of the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular region using a curved ultrasound probe with a sterile transparent dressing. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 1824.[Medline]
8 Tsui BC. Facilitating needle alignment in-plane to an ultrasound beam using a portable laser unit. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007; 32: 848.[Medline]
9 Gray AT, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I. Ultrasound guidance for ulnar nerve block in the forearm. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 3359.[Medline]
10 Liebmann O, Price D, Mills C, et al. Feasibility of forearm ultrasonography-guided nerve blocks of the radial, ulnar, and median nerves for hand procedures in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48: 55862.[Medline]
11 Perlas A, Chan VW, Simons M. Brachial plexus examination and localization using ultrasound and electrical stimulation: a volunteer study. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 42935.[Medline]
12 Tsui BC, Finucane BT. The importance of ultrasound landmarks: a "traceback" approach using the popliteal blood vessels for identification of the sciatic nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006; 31: 4812.[Medline]
13 Eichenberger U, Greher M, Kirchmair L, Curatolo M, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by anatomical dissection. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 23843.
14 Schwarz G, Kleinert R, Dorn C, Litscheer G, Feigl G, Bock N. Pneumatic pulse simulation in cadavers for teaching peripheral plexus blocks. Internet Journal of Anesthesiology 2007; 4.
15 Broking K, Waurick R. How to teach regional anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19: 52630.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Tsui, D. Dillane, J. Pillay, and A. Walji Ultrasound imaging in cadavers: training in imaging for regional blockade at the trunk: [L'imagerie par ultrason pratiquee sur des cadavres : formation en imagerie pour les blocs regionaux au niveau du tronc] Can J Anesth, February 1, 2008; 55(2): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C.H. Tsui, D. Dillane, J. Pillay, A.-K. Ramji, and A. H. Walji Cadaveric ultrasound imaging for training in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks: lower extremity Can J Anesth, June 1, 2007; 54(6): 475 - 480. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |