Erratum
for
Preston, Can J Anesth 54 (1) 9-14.
Erratum
for
Rofaeel et al., Can J Anesth 54 (1) 15-20.
Erratum
for
Hirabayashi, Can J Anesth 54 (2) 160-161.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:406 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007
Errata
ERRATA
In the editorial entitled: "The role of combined spinal epidural analgesia for labour: is there still a question?" published in the January 2007 issue, Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 9–14, the fourth line of the second paragraph should read: fentanyl 15 µg instead of sufentanil 2.5 µg.
In the manuscript entitled: "Intrathecal plain vs hyperbaric bupivacaine for labour analgesia: efficacy and side effects" published in the January 2007 issue, Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 15–20, on page 18, Table IV, the number of patients in the hyperbaric group should read: n = 30 instead of n = 26.
In the Letter to the Editor entitled: "Airway Scope®: initial clinical experience with novice personnel" published in the February 2007 issue, Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 160, although the figure appears correctly online at wwww.cja-jca.org, the lower panels did not completely reproduce in the printed version of the Journal. The complete version of the figure and its accompanying legend are shown below. The publisher apologizes for these errors.
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1 Photograph of the Air way Scope® with a tracheal tube in place in the side channel. A) Front view. B) Lateral view. The device is held in the left hand and passed into the mouth over the tongue, and the tip is placed under the epiglottis. C) View of the glottis of a 33-yr-old female, which was obtained during tracheal intubation using the Air way Scope®. The target signal shown on the monitor is aligned with the glottic opening. D) A cuffed tube is passed from its position in the channel through the vocal cords. E) The position of the tracheal tube is confirmed at the level of the cords.
|
|
