CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teoh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teoh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54:44525 (2007)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2007


Monday June 25; 0800 - 0930

44525 - SURFACE ANATOMY AS A GUIDE TO VERTEBRAL LEVEL FOR THORACIC EPIDURALS

Desiree Teoh1, Kristi Santosham2, Carmen Leydell3, MT Beriault4 and DF Smith5

1 University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
2 University of Calgary
3 University of Calgary
4 University of Calgary
5 University of Calgary

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Precise placement of thoracic epidural catheters is required to provide postoperative analgesia (1) with minimal adverse effects. Previous research shows that anesthesiologists are inaccurate when using surface anatomy to locate vertebral levels (25). This study compares the accuracy of two different landmarks to identify the T7 spinous process.

METHODS: The protocol received local ethics committee approval. Two hundred and ten patients referred for chest radiography gave consent and were randomized to two groups. With the patients in anatomic position, one investigator identified and labeled the presumed T7 spinous process using either C7 (prominens) or the scapular tip as a surface landmark. A radiologist, blinded to the identification technique, reported the spinous process corresponding to the radio-opaque label. Marker positions were then compared using the Fisher exact test. The impact of patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), height, weight) were then examined according to accuracy of landmarking method.

RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between groups. The T7 spinous process was identified correctly 29% of the time with the C7 landmark and 10% with the scapular landmark (p<0.001) (Table 1Go). Accuracy improved for T7 +/– 1 level to 78% and 42% respectively. Errors were more common in the caudal direction. The C7 landmark was more accurate among those with a BMI < 25. In those with a BMI &#8805; 25 neither landmark resulted in high accuracy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1: Comparison of C7 to Scapular Tip for T7 Identification

 
DISCUSSION: In the majority of cases, neither landmark identified T7 accurately. C7 gave more correct identifications than the scapular tip, unless the patient had an increased BMI where accuracy was low regardless of landmarking used. The C7 surface landmark is the more reliable surface landmark for thoracic epidural placement and is successful in 78% of determinations within one interspace.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teoh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teoh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS